SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : SYQUEST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tadsamillionaire who wrote (6751)6/27/1998 5:38:00 AM
From: Dale Stempson  Read Replies (1) of 7685
 
Press: Computer ResellerNews

techweb.com

June 29, 1998, TechWeb News

SyQuest
By

One of the oldest players in the removable-media game, SyQuest has a new, neat concept in the 1-Gbyte SparQ drive. Unfortunately, it should be faster.

The unit tested was bogged down by a slow parallel port interface. Although the parallel port makes a great universal interface, it is too slow for a 1-Gbyte drive. No matter the performance claims, CRN Test Center engineers have never seen even as much as a 1-Mbyte-per-second transfer through a parallel port.

Needless to say, the SparQ drive did not live up to SyQuest's performance claims of a maximum transfer rate of 2 MBps-it did not even come close to minimum performance claims of 900 KBps. Test files totaling 55.3 Mbytes took 355 seconds to copy from hard disk to SparQ disk, for a "write" transfer rate of 156 KBps. At that rate it would take about 107 minutes to fill up a 1-Gbyte cartridge. It took 391 seconds to transfer the same data back to hard disk, for a "read" transfer rate of 141 KBps.

Sometimes it is possible to tweak parallel port settings to improve performance, but tweaking port settings from system to system defeats the purpose of a universal interface. All parallel ports are different, and the SparQ drive might perform much better on one system than another.

______________________________

Regards - Dale
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext