Roger's 1998 Short Picks Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Roger's 1998 Short Picks

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neil_L who wrote (10667)	6/27/1998 11:32:00 AM
From: James Unterburger	Read Replies (2) of 18691

I can't believe that old programs (or new programs for that matter, "well into the nineties") would actually use ASCII byte representation for the Year field of any data structure. Everyone talks about the year being coded as "YY" which I presume means ASCII, i.e., character representation (string) of a numerical quantity. Why didn't they use integer or long integer to represent the Year as a numerical quantity. Heck even 8 bits gives you a range of 256 years. How could anyone be so stupid as to hold numbers in their ASCII form in a database? Unless COBOL sucked so bad that that's all you had. Obviously FORTRAN had numerical data types, the problems were with characters in that language.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next