SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sudhir Khanna who wrote (972)6/27/1998 1:48:00 PM
From: Tomato   of 2251
 
Sudhir,

I'm a bit underinformed by WSP, since they don't seem willing or able to put a schematic drawing on their website to show what the dyke looks like in relation to the lake and peninsula. Sure would be nice to see something like that on their website (hint, hint, WSP!!).

From what is public, do you you know how many meters of the dyke are on land and how many are under the lake at this point? And is there some geometric formula to determine the depth of the dyke at a given distance assuming a 15 degree down dip?

I understand that Kaiser is saying that larger bulk samples are likely to push the value per tonne upward due to the likelihood of getting more large stones per tonne. I'm not sure if this reasoning makes sense to me (if I understand him correctly that is - his single space voluminous look and writing style give me reading comprehension problems). Does that logic make sense to you?

Thanks.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News