SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bill Wexler's Profits of DOOM

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: C.K. Houston who wrote (1269)6/27/1998 1:58:00 PM
From: Peter V  Read Replies (1) of 4634
 
Cheryl, does it really matter that IR responded to Bill directly or to another poster inquiring about the loans? Bill's point was that IR did in fact respond regarding loans that Bill had questioned.

I don't really have an opinion as to whether this is an accurate warning signal as Bill suggests, but I think you are trying to make as much out of this small issue as you accuse Bill of doing in his posts.

Nor do I think that Bill's statement that he suspects stock fraud promotion - and the mention of your report in a subsequent sentence as raising flag's in Bill's mind - amounts to libel. I don't think he implied that you were involved with a stock promotion, at least with the text you posted. But I admit I have not read your report.

Bill may extrapolate facts to reach certain conclusions that some of us might find to be a stretch, but I don't think the courts, the SEC or SI will be too concerned with the opinions given in his posts. They just don't appear to rise to the level of libel or intentionally false information.

Peter
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext