Dusty/Bender:
I must ask you to post Fisher's point of view on those whole mess.
Both of you say you have information that is not appropriate to post at this time. Well, spit it out. Now is just a good time as any.
>>The more you try to make people perceive it is you and Mark against the rest of us inquiring minds, the more it makes inquiring minds want to know what is going on between you and Mark against us.<<
Interesting spin. It isn't Gary and Mark vs. everybody else, rather it is Everybody else vs fisher & affiliates and you.
I'm interested in what is best for Midland and it's shareholders.
At this point the best thing for Midland shareholders, are #1 to make sure the stop transfer orders are enforced, #2: recovery of shares and/or money, #3: bring SEC filings up to date, #4: with a clean MIDL shell, do another aquisition.
It might not be the best thing for fisher, but I don't give a damn (due to the facts below). It might not be the best thing for arconenergy either, but if they don't have DF-144, than I don't want arcon either.
Fact: fisher violated SEC Rule-144 by selling restricted insider shares into the market.
Fact: fisher illegally converted restricted preferred B into trading MIDLP
Fact: fisher left the country, and is in the Bahamas.
Fact: It's 1 week, before fisher issues a rebuttal press release [in which he does not deny that he sold shares. he doesn't admit that he sold shares, but this would have been the perfect opportunity to say 'i did not violate Rule-144']
Kurt |
