SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Caussa Capital (formerly Antares) T.CAU
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gabe Heti who wrote (3663)6/29/1998 9:34:00 AM
From: john  Read Replies (1) of 4718
 
Gabe if you say everything is peaches and cream, must be so. I stand corrected, glad everything is fine.

<No one from Antares has ever claimed 50 million ounces>

I never said anyone from Antares said the above, I believe I said one of the posters to this thread.

<Peter Southward has never suggested anything beyond what is in press releases>

Never said that he did, just said that he keeps saying that a release is coming next week. Frankly he should say nothing if he does not know.

<I don't see how Dennis Gray's actions make him a "shady character">

I'll put you in charge of checking into the past, I do not have time. But the fact that he said Rappa would not be sold in January and freely admited in the annual report that they made a decision in May of 1997 to "rid" themselves of Rappa, indicates clearly to me that he speaks out both sides of his mouth.

<Are you suggesting that Antares should hold on the Rappa. Provide some support.>

My point was not whether they hold on or not it was the fact that Gray said it would NOT be sold.

<The news on B.C. was given in the Annual Report.>

Yes, and what a successful drill season, was it 65000 ounces for 3.9 million dollars spent.

<Neither you nor anyone else has produced any evidence of manipulation by Antares or by anyone else.>

Wayne Wolinski has alluded to the fact that the share price keeps getting driven down so some can accumulate. Gee Gabe I agree with Wayne's statements, what do you want to call it other then manipulation? Also, Gabe I never said Antares as I firmly believe it is NOT Antares involved in the manipulation.

< would you prefer to see a run-up to $1 and a drop back to 30 cents?>

Exactly what you will see if there is a run with no NEWS. It may not head back to 30 but it will fall back to 50 or 60. If it even makes it to a buck.

< I see it as an expression of frustration, but at what?>

Frustration at the management of Antares and the lack of information from the company. In my opinion Gabe they are not trustworthy nor are they competent.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News