SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Libertarian Discussion Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: freeus who wrote (52)6/29/1998 11:37:00 AM
From: MeDroogies  Read Replies (1) of 13062
 
Well, that IS an oversimplification...I have NEVER read anywhere that NO TAXES is a Libertarian belief. Libertarians recognize a need for LIMITED government.
I'm not saying you are wrong. At heart, I agree with you. Fact is, you can't get there from here. Baby steps...
On the other hand, as far as drug use and taxation are concerned, I don't see precisely how this is using other people's money....fact is, abusers would be providing a solid chunk of the future cash they'd be using to get clean. Call it an insurance policy against changed minds...
To be fair, drug abuse IS a very complicated matter that often involves clouded thought patterns. Personally, I feel it is in EVERYONE's best interest to provide an out for those who suddenly realize the error of their ways. That is reasonable, and everyone benefits. The relative cost/benefit analysis would overwhelmingly be in favor of this type of relationship.
Tax legalized drug use as a means of providing possible future rehab? Beats the hell out of not providing abusers with a way out. The alternative is that abusers, by and large, remain abusers...and a drag on individuals due to their negative impact on society at large.
That is hardly conflicting with the Libertarian view. It promotes and enhances CHOICE.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext