All this commotion about Jenkins' performance today on CNBC is ridiculous. TAVA will live or die based on two things -- (1) its earnings growth, and (2) the public perception of the Y2K problem. Six months from now, nobody will even remember that Jenkins was on CNBC.
Also, I would read absolutely zilch into TAVA's price action these past couple of days. TAVA's share price was driven up by the daytraders, and its share price was then driven back down by the daytraders. End of story. This happens everyday to stocks that get prominently mentioned on CNBC.
Finally, I have been a long-time lurker on this thread and am long a small amount of shares. Despite this, I welcome input from shorts who take the time to make cogent arguments about TAVA's promise or lack thereof because it helps me to better evaluate TAVA as an investment.
It amazes me, though, to see shorts who normally seem reasonably intelligent on other threads, spew out idiotic drivel on this thread. For example, comparing TAVA to ZITL is laughable, as is saying that TAVA is somehow in financial trouble or that its remediation processes don't work.
TAVA is a great story with a bright future. Whether it is currently overvalued is open for debate, which I welcome. It would be nice, though, if we could shift the focus of this thread back to the FACTS of TAVA's business and away from the running commentary and opinion-fest it has degenerated into.
I'll crawl back under my rock, now.
Dave. |
