Amati investors Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Amati investors

AMTX 1.650

-4.3%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: fibonacci who wrote (6543)	12/2/1996 9:53:00 PM
From: John Morrison	of 31386

First post was a clue ... >>>Give me one example that a company has made a living with nothing but its royalty. I can't think of any. I have not heard of any news regarding mass production of AMTX's modems. To make one modem work perfectly is easy, to make a million of them work is another story. Why should AMTX be so expensive? Just because it has guys from Stanford? If Bell labs became a public company all by itself, would you buy its stock? e. <<< "Why should AMTX be so expensive? Just because it has guys from Stanford?" A nonsense negative statement on very first post. Remember the stew I started in questioning it. If SI is requiring email addresses for new members then the entity cannot get any new names. But the entity may have registered a number of names early this year. Will there be another? Let's hope it is about out of names. Will The Entity's true identity/motive soon be disclosed? A Market Maker, a Broker, a Hedge Fund, a jealous engineer, someone with an axe to grind with one or more Amati executives, a competitor, and an agent of one of these? John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next