SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Wind River going up, up, up!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Pirah Naman who wrote (3365)6/30/1998 2:09:00 AM
From: Richard Karpel  Read Replies (2) of 10309
 
Pirah, I would like to hear management's response to the FAS 123 issue, and would appreciate it if you were to contact them on our behalf. The question is simply: Why does the company feel it needs to support a stock option program that appears to be more generous than other similarly situated companies? (Although I know nothing about ESOPs, I trust that your views on this issue -- as well as Michael Greene's -- are accurate.)

While you're at it, you may want to ask why management felt the need to adopt a "poison pill" plan, which was supposed to be put to a vote at the recent shareholders' meeting. (Peter Church -- was the plan approved?) It's been about three weeks since I read the materials that were sent prior to the meeting, so I don't recall the details of the plan, but I do remember being irritated when I read about it.

Taken together, these two issues are beginning to create an impression in my mind of a management more concerned about its own interests than its shareholders'. As someone who probably has too large a percentage of his money invested in this company, I hope my impression is mistaken. In any case, I'd like to hear what Mr. Abelmann or Mr. Fiddler has to say.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext