SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!!
DGIV 0.00Dec 5 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Craig K who wrote (16467)6/30/1998 8:27:00 PM
From: Moonglow  Read Replies (2) of 50264
 
Hi Hangin!

THANKS!! I think I understand....a little bit anyway. Let me repeat to you the gist of what I understood from your note...and see if I got it right.

Ok, from what you said, it is my understanding that the smaller the bandwidth, the better.

So....DGIV may have a proprietary bandwidth that isn't standard, and yet if it uses a smaller bandwidth it would be worth it for it not to meet the standard.

Because......it can be converted at the gateway to the standard.

Did I get that right so far? You have no idea how difficult it is for me to read technical stuff. It's like reading a foreign language.

Anyway, since DGIV plans to have gateways at both ends of the POP...then they can convert their own stuff, and won't need to use anybody else's stuff. Is that right?

So....taking this one step farther....is it correct to assume that since DGIV will have gateways at both ends that they could convert someone else's larger bandwidths to their own specifications and thereby make that someone else's voicetech sound better?

Or am I going off into space with that one?

Thanks again!
Juanita
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext