SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!!
DGIV 0.00Dec 5 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Craig K who wrote (16483)6/30/1998 11:47:00 PM
From: TheLineMan  Read Replies (1) of 50264
 
You pretty much have it Juanita except for one thing,,,"make it soundbetter"...Encoded voice sounds good a best and unacceptable at the worst...it is impossible to convert already encoded voice to another code and make it sound better...the quality loss was taken with the first encode, but a loss should not occur in the conversion. because it is performed in the digital arena...what I mean by that is that bits are shuffled around into new positions without any getting lost or misplaced as opposed to getting converted to analog and then re-sampled which would result in additional loss....Hope that make sense....
One word entropy!!!! The original data is lost once the the voice data has been quantized. So DGIV will put together an algorithm to convert encoded voice from one format to another without loss of quality. Will they have it working within the next 5 years?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext