Linux is a consumer product I bought off the shelf. If you choose to buy it, you know where to look for its products. That is what makes it a consumer product.
The G3 point ONLY further proves that there is a marketplace. If there is a need to run Windows (and there always is - there's a need to run lots of OSs if you're any kind active user), then the G3 offers you a vastly greater amount of choice than any typical Wintel box.
For the public to realize that will only require massive PR and advertising. But that happens to be what MSFT is good at, and why they are in the position they are in. There are no laws against good marketing.
As for IBM, you did vastly overgeneralize. Review the facts of the IBM case and the DOJ's effectiveness on IBM. If the DOJ was so effective, why did IBM continue to grow during the longest portion of time the DOJ brought the case against them? Seems to me, people's attention were drawn to IBM, and their superior products were recognized for what they were....or, as in the case of MSFT, their marketing became more effective.
The DOJ's case against IBM diminished dramatically as time went on, and eventually was left with no teeth as the market morphed around IBM...any agreements and rulings that resulted were window dressing for the DOJ to declare victory and go home.
I state again, if the government is serious about hitting MSFT where they live, why not use the market and cancel contracts? How come nobody speaks to that point? Also, why didn't the DOJ go after Apple when they tried to corner the computer market? They had complete and total control of a very large portion of the market for some time. Why was Apple immune from DOJ pressure? Because the DOJ wanted time to let the market work? If so, why doesn't the DOJ let the market work again? |
