Eddy,
<<< Is it not a fact that you did not get the job with SPRY because of your incompetence and displayed dishonesty during the interview? >>>
My competence got me the interview in the first place, Eddy, and the job was not offered as SPRX received a financial grant which changed their short-term business plan and their immediate staffing requirements. But I did receive an excellent opportunity to see the company from the inside and the positive perception I received has been with me over the years resulting in a purchase during their IPO last year. Not many companies have that effect on me and this one, in particular, was the greatest of all I have encountered. Did I mention that I also interviewed at BICO in 1993 and immediately perceived that company as a disaster waiting to happen?
Now why is it that you, Eddy, pose your questions in such a manner as to give an appearance of having done some investigation into myself or that you may have access to some inside information? You do not even know who I am. Such an approach in rebuttal is inflammatory and misleads the other readers on this thread. Shame on you!
<<< Secondly your relentless pounding on struck down woman coming from you ... is one hell of a display of greed and malice seldom to be witnessed. >>>
Seldom to be noticed, yes, I agree. Not many people would invest their time warning others to avoid what appears to be a fraud and not receive financial gain in return. Greed and malice, however, I think not! You see, I almost invested in CCSI along with SPRX because of the hype generated by Janybird, yourself, and others. But the fact that the deal was promised, then promised again and again just didn't bode well with me. Your hype almost suckered me in and thank God my instinct kept me clear of such disaster. My concern for alerting others to not go one step further than I did is what keeps me here!
FYI, I am neither long nor short on CCSI, I am long on SPRX and the payoff there will not come with the BiliCheck but rather with the diabetic instruments under development.
Last, I believe relentless is an adjective better suited to describing Janybird as her relentlessness in hyping CCSI has done far more damage to others (who had the misfortune of investing in this company) than mine (which hopefully helped others to avoid this stock and retain their money). As for pounding on Janybird, she obviously made an effort to distort the facts presented and deserved to be called onto the mat. I notice she has not responded since she was corrected. The truth has a way of doing that some times.
Rockin' Robin |
