FONR...Patent on Cancer Detection.... Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FONR...Patent on Cancer Detection....

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: l. niedzwiecki who wrote (145)	12/3/1996 1:58:00 PM
From: John Soileau	of 560

Yes, that's it! I'll have to figure out how to cut and paste. Thanks for putting this on the thread. Note the observation by the author (an intellectual property attorney at an exceptional firm) that the damages determination by the Fonar court was done "...all following the reasoning in Rite-Hite." If the appellate court agrees that the decision properly followed Rite-Hite and other precedents, it will affirm the decision. Only if the appellate court determines that error was committed in the trial court will it remand (send back for modification) or reverse (undo the judgment entirely). Complete reversal is in my opinion a long, long shot. Remand unfavorable to Fonar, or remand favorable to Fonar (i.e. damages to be awarded for inducement, the 13.6 million) are both in my view unlikely. Affirmance appears to be the likely outcome. Hey, just my opinion, and I'm long on Fonar. I'd like to hear from an IP attorney if any are lurking quietly out there. Regards, John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next