Thanks, but no thanks, Aleta. If Tara is going to be there, I'm going to be there.
With respect to the Zulu thread, there are enough objective-minded posters here who can question what the company is doing. For example, I've had no problem with questions that BlueFox has asked, nor have I had any problem with his criticisms. He objectively does so; whereas Tara would spill ink all over Zulu any opportunity he can find.
I note of late, however, that Tara's been trying to temper his remarks to appear more objective. Maybe the boycott is having an effect. But knowing him, I suspect it is more because he knows he can impress new folks that he knows will be coming into Zulu and, thus, on this thread.
Why won't Tara answer the question regarding Mincheff's speech in Chicago? He hasn't commented on this thread and he repeatedly ignores the question on Doubleclick's thread. If he'd answer the question, I wouldn't hound him. But he just can't go over there and spill beans that don't need spilling. He, too, must be held accountable--not just Zulu.
Furthermore, in this whole time I've been posting on SI, I've never crossed over into Doubleclick's thread. And I wouldn't--unless I'm given good reason to do so. So please, rather than invoking a compulsion to criticize me, look at the whole matter in balance. Then you will see why I've posted onto Doubleclick. Thank you. |
