You haven't pointed out a single lie yet,
because there ain't none other than the ones
you are telling yourself. If you can't issue a
post relevant to LSI, please don't post here
Lie #1. Your very first post on this thread which was on May 15th after the market closed wherein you indicated that there was a one million share block of LSI for sale. It never happened. This means that you lie about quotes
Lie#2. Your posted Cnet article which was critical of a Minolta digital camera. You claimed it had an LSI Dcam chip. It didn't. This means that you lie about what products LSI has its chips in.
Lie#3. You posted a three week old link to a false story that indicated that LSI would not have any chips in Playstation II, despite the fact that there were public announcements from Montgomery Securities that LSI would be selling its chips for Playstation II. This episode means that not only will you lie, but when the story turns out to erroneous, you will blame LSI IR.
Lie#4. You published a post which indicated that Wilf Corrigan had predicted lower earnings this quarter because of Yen problems. You indcated that the information came from LSI IR, when if fact you knew it was a misquote from a Dow Jones article. This means that you lie about the CEO, IR, and future earnings.
Lie #5 You have made the ludicrous claim that you own 75,000 shares in LSI. This means that you are a very sad person who needs to impress others by lieing about herself. Oh, by the way, despite your claims to having been a straight A student, your writing suggests college dropout--sophomore year at best.
Lie#6. Your lied in reply to my post where I asserted that LSI had outperformed the SOX since your first post of May 15th. You claimed that LSI had performed about even with the SOX. Not quite. There was a difference of 15% in the two prices. This means tht you will lie despite obvious evidence to the contrary.
Lie#7. You have shown insouciant concern with LSI IR's performance in promoting the company to institutions. It was desinged to pass yourself off as just another investor in LSI. When I publically invited you to ameliorate the issue by acting as a intermediary with LSI IR, you belly turned soft. This means that you will use any flimsy excuse possible to get out of your lies.
Lie #8 Your supposed conversation with Diana Matley wherein Ms. Matley supposedly told you positive news on LSI, when the very next day analysts lowered their rating on LSI based upon imformation that was contrary to what you were told. You know IR departments keep logs of those things don't you? This means that you are willing to lie and harm a decent person such as Ms. Matley without regard to the consequences.
These are all LSI related lies that came from only one chronic pathological liar--you.
That just about gets us up to date on the lies. We won't get into your personal swipes at Shane, E, David, GP, Tony, or others because the swipes are not lies, rather they are just another side of your many many many sided personalities. Nor will we include your endless attempts to create the impression that there has been massive institutional selling since your inital May 15th post on this thread. The fats are that LSI has stayed even while the SOX has gone down 15%. I am sure there will be more lies to come.
And now a final message. As others on this thread know, I have other important business that will keep me off of this thread until August 15th with the exception of my earnings report on the conference call. I have a strong suspicion that additional analyst upgrades will follow including Edelsotne's. For the long-term investor this is a superior paly for the next two or three years. I only stepped in because this pimple of a man or woman spread one too many lies. I look forward to returning August 16th. good luck and Good health to everyone.
|
