SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: VAUGHN who wrote (1718)	7/3/1998 12:37:00 AM
From: S. E. Baker	Read Replies (1) of 7235

Vaughn: Thank you very much for your most interesting post #1718. I find the idea of a 12,500,000 ct/yr production rate quite attractive, but it would require a plant somewhere around 40,000 tons/day. I've never heard mention from anyone of any more than perhaps 10,000 tons/day. We'll have to wait and see, I guess. As for the possibility of paleogravels, I had been wondering about erosion and the drainage patterns. Your post is the first I've seen any information on the issue. The possibility of paleogravels from M-1 would certainly attract DB's interest. It certainly attracts mine! Again, thanks for your reply. Cheers! Steve

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next