Is this so bad a response over at Doubleclick's thread--a place I'd never been to before (were I hyping, don't you think I would have visited there long ago?). Aleta, you should think about how YOU fit in into all of this. What follows is a reasonably good example of my kind of dialogue over at Doubleclick:
To: +Steve Antonelli (327 )
From: +PartyTime
Thursday, Jul 2 1998 3:54PM ET
Reply # of 341
>>>Jeez Party time... LET IT GO!!
We don't care about ZULU, good or bad...
This is a DCLK thread! Give it a rest... <<<
No problem, Steve. I'm more than happy to let it go. I've been an avid Zulu investor
since September. And you'll note not once have I ever crossed over onto this thread.
But for months I've been watching Jon Tara's vendetta against Zulu, as he continually
poisons and spills his venom against the stock in which I've chosen my investment.
I was tipped by others that he had arrived here. I didn't want his arrival here to go
unanswered. As you can see in just the short bit of debate on this thread, he spills his
venom and then disappears when challenged on a key question, i.e., relative to Zulu
keynoting at the Chicago conference.
I'm more than happy to let it go, so long as I'm confident that he is not tainting Zulu on
this thread. Zulu is new and it deserves to develop on its own merit.
In closing, many of us who are veterans with Zulu, believe some day it will rise to
compete against Doubleclick. In the meanwhile, we appreciate seeing Doubleclick raise
the bar of competition. Congratulations.
PS: If one were to include the work that Zulu does for Netscape, Lycos and Infoseek, I
believe a case could be made for higher Zulu figures as well. But time will tell in all of
this.
|
