To: Mark Visnic from Yahoo Thread (Excuse typing errors)
You are right about one thing. It takes time to post these messages. What does that have to do with anything?
Please spell it out for me. Here is what I want to know:
A: Enumerate clearly the flaws in VLNC. Be precise, concise, and to the point.
B: Point out to me where I have expressed to you an analysis of LD messages and/or how you can assume that you know what I have read into his messages, and how you came to the conclusion that I have a garbled understanding of his messages.
C: What is your point? re: "My point is clear: It takes time to write posts. Time is dear. For the moment, I've chosen to engage in debate on this thread. Now try again to understand the context of
"for the moment." You used words which specifically delineate time "...for the moment..." and which imply that within that time frame your point of view differs from a presupposed norm. ie: 'For the
moment I will address you.' When the moment ends, I am no longer addressing you. You wrote, "For the moment at least, I am choosing not to be so callous." Can this be more clear? When the moment ends, IMO, you may choose to or revert to being callous. Logically, that can lead one to presume that you could also be a member of the group of 'professional manpulators' you are chiding.
D: Enumerate my 'assumptions' if they differ from what I clearly stae hence. Insofar as my reading of postings on this thread are concerned, the consensous of opionion is that one should not be invested
in any stock without doing one's homework, and making up one's mind independently from any opinion given by anyone, anywhere. I never presume to know which of you have not done your DD nor will I presume to know where anyones funds come from. I choose to presume that each person is involved in the process of their own free will. Therefore,
each is responsible for themselves, as I am responsible for myself. I am bound, however, by a value system. That value system tell me to do no harm. To tell it like it is. Please tell me where you find this
to be in error.
E:You state that the difference between you and dkctx is the degree of expectation. Can I presume from your statement that you fully expect Valence to fail? Does this mean that you can find no reason to believe that they can succeed? If so. Say so. Then give your reasons. Where dkctx has hopes for the best while he fears the worst, are you telling us that you have see no hope? Spell it out. Many
have doubts. Some, like noway, have doubts, telling us that the market is telling him to wait, while simultaneously engagin in trading the issue. Complex, isn't it? Some, like myself, view my choice to
trade as an affirmation of the process of the market. Valence is simply an available stock with which one can trade. The market is the message.
F: I invite you to enlighten us. If you have some knowledge as to a more certain stock investment,please do not hesitate to inform us.
G: I am waiting for you to address the pump and dump sector. And those who will enter a thread and muck about to find short term profit, then disappear.
I continue to own shares in this company. Shares that I freely purchased on the open market. I understand that being invested in this stock involves risk, and that this issue is HIGLY SPECULATIVE. I have seen the value of my stock increase and decrease and have had no input in setting the daily price on the exchange. I recommend that anyone with doubts, do not purchase any stock until/unless you fully recognize the risks associated with the process of stock ownership/investing.
Buckle Up!
M |
