Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (33918)	7/3/1998 10:03:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) of 1574211

Re: "Did AMD tell the client he was getting the fast parts(marked fast) or were they marked slow but were fast?" I don't know, I wasn't the one who brought up AMD's involvement. Fact is that this does happen in our industry. The reason I don't think the lawsuit will amount to anything is that in the case of B&L, it appears that it was a part of their business plan. Not so in the case of CPU suppliers. Yields are not so easily predicted nor is customer demand. I do not believe that AMD or Intel intended as part of their business plan to cross ship fast material, but did so only as a temporary response to unequal binsplit and demand. Intel has dealt with a sustained shift to higher speed material by simply pricing slow material at the same price as fast material, hence no one orders slow material anymore. I don't think the suit will go anywhere but even if it does, I think it will be fairly easy to show there was no intent to defraud, nor was Intel's practices any different from industry norm, as evidenced by AMD own published statements. EP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next