CAML lovers Where are you? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CAML lovers Where are you?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jeanette Fitzgerald who wrote (1114)	12/3/1996 9:45:00 PM
From: Philip Pasteur	of 1541

Jeanette, "I wonder from where you get your information. It is clear from the rest of your posting that you have no idea of the real facts instead of this misinformation you post. It is amazing that it is always some unnamed source. I have known and worked with Danny Wettriech for over eight years. In that time I have been pregnant and had two children and was able to organize my schedule as necessary for two additional step-children. Additionally, other employees of the company have had children during their tenure and he has never said or acted in a manner such as you have portrayed in your lie. For anyone to say that Danny would make a comment like that is ludricous and it obviously is from someone who does not know him nor have they ever met him." I am glad that Danny has always treated you with respect. This is highly commendable. Unfortunately it seems that not everyone has the same status in his eyes. The story was related to me by someone that I have known for a long time and has no axe to grind with Camelot. I believe it to be accurate. My quote may have not been verbatim, but it was real close. "Frankly, Mr. Pasteur, I am unclear of your motives but I do know from reading your postings that you have no real understanding of Camelot or the sincerity of the people who work here. You have consistently misrepresented the truth while claiming to have sources that are always anonymous. I am sure that the shareholders of Camelot would prefer that I continued to do productive activities rather than get into name-calling with you. I believe it would behove you to check your sources better and ask why they will not give their names. Libel can get very expensive." I have had dealing with many of the current employees of Camelot. I have written of my positive experiences...this is on the record. I have no reason to try to alienate any of them. My problem has consistently been with the management team, as it relates to business ethics. It seems that your employees are generally kept in the dark about this aspect. Perhaps I understand more than you would like. I have always represented the truth as I know it. I have quoted facts when I could and indicated conjecture where appropriate. It just seems that my perception of the facts does not match what is made public by Camelot. My sources of personal information remain anonymous because they have asked that his be done. It seems that in most cases they have some fear of retribution. With the legal activities of Camelot in the past, I cannot imagine why that might be. I wish to engage in no name calling, nor will I, but I must admit that the story that you referenced above, truly made me cringe. Libel?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next