David you make some valid points, however,
we're talking about a World Wide News Organization reporting a rumor by a Professional Analyst BASED on hearsay. I bought back in at 78-5/8 this morning had the news been confirmed and reported properly I could have sold and bought back at 73+ change. If you believe Reuters is just a pawn it the game that's wrong. Reuters is a willing player in spreading this rumor, and plenty of people made profits, to report this without printing the analyst's name is sinful if not criminal. As they say " words mean things". As Dylan said "you don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blow". Somebody posted today that USR should move to the NYSE, that would be better, however when we sit and do TA, chart, research and take wild ass guesses it doesn't matter you can't win against forces of this nature. Just because the stock went up quickly doesn't automatically mean a drop of this amount.
Well that's my stinking opinion,
Scrapps
PS hey nobody told me the html codes vanish and can't be edited. |
