I don't often post on this thread, but I have read it diligently every day since late May. During the last month I've been very disturbed by the claims that DGIV is a scam, that some of the posters are hypsters, and that others, the DGIV critics, are shorters or in league with shorters. Being fairly new to the BBs, it's been difficult for me to sort out who is lying and who is telling the truth.
I had a moment of epiphany, however, when I read the following series of posts from one of the repeat naysayers on this thread. I suggest anybody out there who is confused as I was take a few seconds to read them. You will see an individual who first attempts to characterize himself as a poor duped slob quickly emerge as an out and out naysayer.
<<Yes, Bill news is imminent. I am very worried. I purchased 6000 shares at an average price of about 4 1/2. I called a college room mate of mine who works at Goldman Sachs who reavealed some very disturbing news to me. He claims the company is broke. (#13856) >> {note: when this was posted, the stock had just closed at 4 1/2. This made me wonder why would anybody be worried about losing money on a stock when it had just closed at his purchase price? Why not just sell it at no loss other than the broker's fees?)
<<Gary, this is a totally unregulated company that dosen't report or
answer to anyone. How would we know what the insiders are doing?This
company is totally unregulated.>> (#13871)
<<Read the fianacials or continue on with the sheep >>(#13885)
<<10.5 million shares and the press keeps printing >>(#13889)
<<I know the facts . you know hype>> (#13903) (RESPONDING TO:
Interesting how ANALYST10 AND DAVID FIDLER just joined SI today and are only concerned with DGIV.Nuff said. R. Gates
The poster of these messages apparently decided to adopt a persona of an innocent duped investor, probably hoping to gain the sympathy of others who had bought, as I had, at much higher prices than that day's close of 4 1/2, so that he could then persuade them that they had made a mistake and should sell. For some reason, he quickly decided to abandon that persona and go on an outright attack (along with ANALYST10) of DGIV's credibility. He continues to post along these lines.
I suggest to anybody who is confused, as I was, about who is lying and who is telling the truth, to simply compare these posts with those of DGIV's supporters. I have yet to find any evidence among the stock's supporters of deliberate attempts to mislead others as to their interests or identity. This does not mean DGIV is going to be a success (which I think and hope that it will), but simply that some of the naysayers on this thread are trying to deceive others as to their own identities and motives. They are not to be trusted. |
