Mary or Who else could answer regulators questions ?
Mary is only around to answer any embarrassing questions that regulators might have, this is just savvy management.
The company maintains large offices in Bolivia with more than 100 people, who have done nothing this year, so far.
Everyone should be aware of the peripheral players, the rude and uncultured USA Today, who slyly bash the company for gain of some kind, we are narrowing it down.
The rude and uncultured SEC who will do anything to shake a few shares loose so they can get a piece of the bird, I believe they may be angling for a drumstick, anyone care to expand on this hypothesis ?
Finally, a fictitious poster on Silicon Investor, who insists on presuming that he is real, thanks to Jay for spotting this potential note of discord in an otherwise harmonious house. Here is an example of the fictitious poster using terror tactics on the Annoying thread (rumour has it that Mr. Lawrence, a fictitious SI personality, may have had a hand in starting that thread to bash companies or people or things, that are annoying.) Here, look for yourself. Just scroll down the list to see 436-442, that is criminal.
#subject-21817-Range-400 |