Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dale J. who wrote (33904)	7/6/1998 1:00:00 AM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (2) of 1574094

Dale, <There was no clear definition. A product cannot be a deluxe and standard simultaneously.> Can a product be 300MHz and 266MHz simultaneously? What if some evidences will be found that those parts can pass both 300 and 266 "definitions" and therefore are "essentially" identical? In this case there may be no difference from the B&L case. If Intel has "clear definitions" as you seem to imply, there should be no problem to run corresponding tests on questionable parts and find out that the parts are identical. Therefore, you may think of the standard product (266MHz) as being sold as deluxe (300MHz) product, with all implications about "damages"... I think this case is a goldmine for smart lawyers. I would not underestimate them.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next