SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 166.20+0.7%3:49 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: kech who wrote (12070)7/6/1998 10:56:00 AM
From: Dovi  Read Replies (2) of 152472
 
To All

Hope this question has not been answered but there are just too many posts to go through. In the latest Gilder Technology Report, George discusses the victory of CDMA. He seems to say that the mighty Q wins even if W-CDMA is the standard adopted in Europe rather than IS-95. Clearly, part of the "victory" is that it vindicates those that have stood firmly behind the viability of CDMA. I want to know, however, how the victory leads to revenue. Specifically, is W-CDMA possible without the Q's participation? Can ERICY and others produce the equipment (handsets, base stations etc.) necessary for W-CDMA without the participation (e.g. the technical know-how) of the Q AND without infringing on QCOM patents?

Thanks in advance

CDOVI
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News