SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 242.44+5.0%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hank Stamper who wrote (21108)7/6/1998 3:16:00 PM
From: Sid Stuart  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
Re the above quote: I work part time at a smallish hospital in a semi-rural district
in British Columbia. We've got about 300 employees and I would guess about
100 computers (maybe less, but that's immaterial to my thesis here). I spoke
recently with the MIS guy (keeps the network going; trouble shoots & repairs
computers etc.) about Y2K. We've got a lot of very old boxes. He said, over 90
percent of our machines will not work properly with the network come Y2K.

I reckon this is the same for many organizations similar in size.

Is the reckoning right? If so, would this represent any kind of significant demand
for chips-->fabs-->semi-capital equipment?


Another aspect of Y2K's impact on corporation buying patterns is that the IT departments of many large companies are so focused on the Y2K problem that they are pushing off the purchase of new computers (I've read this in industry mags as well as seen it in a large company I used to work for.) As these companies finish the testing process, there will be a pent up demand for new purchases. I think 1999 will be a good year for computer companies as they work to fill this demand.

Sid
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext