Hi "CD"! ***All Shareholders/Readers*** [The CVIA COURT CASE] -Friday
Wow, yes! I guess a judge will be hearing some comments as he
makes his decisions. If I were the judge, I would be concerned
about the balance of power in the agreement talks. Responsibility
to answer questions, I suppose, will belong to Jack. Any WOTD
papers of course, the judge may only be interested in their
legal appearance not the consequence of them? -since it is a case
within CVIA, and not against WOTD? "I don't know." someone
may want to correct me here, because I may not know
what I'm talking about.
If I were a judge, I might think, yes, this Jack is all alone.
As a judge, not a business man, I would think of how that
situation might best be corrected.
In not desiring to jeopardize the success of the talks himself,
for that is not his job, the judge may think Jack should not
be removed, as only he knows what is going on, and Jack is the
only link to any owners of CVIA (the shareholders), and to the
talks as well. Loss of Jacks knowledge by him being excluded
might not be in the best interest of anyone.
I would also consider the legal rights of an investor, or
stockholder; how those rights are limited because investors
trade in and out of a stock freely for the purpose of gain.
Knowing that insider trading (for gain) can be different, and
I would be suspicious for the Reg. S and behavior related to that;
And be wondering where the money ultimately is to be, or has been
used, and by whom. However, they have had ample time to make
all this appear legal. So what the judge sees/hears will be quite
cloudy (when will CVIA be paid back?), or misleading,
(Was This money was squandered long ago, and the "loan"
is paper created to cover the fact).
Those were just "what ifs", but I am amused. What company,
after the merger would be compelled to pay itself back??
That paper sure is a pain the butt for present day
stockholders though. People "closer" to the money made sure of
that.
I would love to read the words passed around in the
courtroom, KAA! Is that possible? On a thread called "GIFT,
(the Internet patent)", the source to conversation in the court
was provided, (a link to another web site) Might we be able
to read an account of the courtroom questions and answers
in the same way? That would be a blast for getting a down home feel
feel for the situation rather than a simple one paragraph piece
of news!
I am tired of vague news; -that now CVIA can't even afford to
broadcast. This would be words from Jack, the
lawyer, and the judge. Any where from Simulating information to
paid for entertainment, It would give the shareholder a chance
to use his mind on some present day issues. For quite a while
the blinders have been on for "pin the tail on the donkey"
-present day thread efforts have been trying to end.
Congratulations. $5000 = 10 news broadcasts from what I understand.
I wonder how many pages of reading material might be available
soon from the legal effort that was piloted on this thread?
It could be a nice bonus!
And After all, isn't what goes on in most courtrooms open to the
public. And Is any reliable person going to drop into the courtroom
to make note of the sweat or emotion that can't be noticed in the
written words alone?
__________________________
Non SI members may post their comments on the CVIA Thread by
e-mailing them to:
badlee@flash.net
Direct me who you are responding to as well if you like. (post #)
Please send, what the heck!! Love to hear your thoughts before,
during, after the court case ALL COMMENTS WELCOME!
ESPECIALLY IF ANYONE "DROPS INTO THE COURTROOM" FRIDAY AND HAS
FIRST HAND FEEDBACK.... YES YES!! PLAN ON IT AND SEND!!
Let us know beforehand if you plan to go as well!
thanks Dave
___________________________
nice to see your post CD! -AKA "Charlie Ballance"
-Let's see if some answers for your question
can be generated for all to be up to date.
by the way .......love your Harley Motorcycle, Lifeman!
truly a work of art. You look very...
........."satisfied"! -g-
Dave |
