Dusty,
You can try as hard as you like to make something bad out of this, but I hate to tell you, it just ain't there!
I find it ironic that you, who cried from the rafters Fisher's right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, would make a post concerning Pierce with such a cynical tone.
What I do not understand is why you made your post to Bender. I mean, he had posted #1981, which would be indicative that he maybe didn't know. Gary answered him on #1982, and while it was not very verbose, James acknowledged his response. It all appeared to be asked, answered, and accepted. So why do you, 8 hours later, and to Bender, who obviously didn't have the answers, post basically the same question, but in a much more accusing tone? It's not like you were just responding to the last thing posted. Sounds a little deliberate to me.
What I do not understand is your motive. I don't believe you are simply trying to get "all the information". Rather, I believe that you were trying to cast doubt and further distrust of Pierce. What most people with the slightest fraction of sense can see is that this guy is our only hope of ever getting back one red cent of what was taken from us. What happened Dusty, did somebody teach you how to short?
I think "sever" is indeed the key word here, but I think it applies more to what you should do with your pathetic attempts to slam this stock.
Binder
|
