SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: violetta martinez who wrote (5551)7/8/1998 12:01:00 PM
From: BWEEB  Read Replies (1) of 7966
 
Violetta, K14 was under 40 cpht but you should remember that there was at least 4 distinct phases in this pipe. The results on k14 were as high as 88cpht in parts. The geophysics also shows 4 distinct regions on k14. This does not appear to be the case for K91. (only my observation based on the geophysics). This may provide for more uniform results of k91. It is also important to note that the MACRO diamonds from the micro diamond tests are the main indicator of the pipes early stage potential. It is believed that the micro portion consists of a different phase than that of the macro's and thus are not very reliable in the prediction of the pipes ultimate grade.(this was mentioned to me at a diamond conference) This is unlike other parts of the world where micros can generally predict the final cpht values of the pipe. (ie: Argyle,). Now to my point........K91 has better macro diamonds per 10kg than that of k14's early stage micro tests. My scientific prediction of grade (ha!) is 85 cpht but I threw in an extra 10 cpht in the guessing game we got going. (listed under LOOGAN)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext