I for one do not feel I have a major problem with negative posts,,,I want to be as well informed of TSIG's negative aspects as of it's positive aspects & potential.
If a post is civil, forthright, and polite, I would generally be willing to help that person address their concerns as I am able, or when I have a mind to do so.
If on the other hand, some panic-attack, frothing at the mouth, naysayer with only a temp-account comes into the TSIG forum with Cr*p ladden dungarees just wanting to unload, I will either ignore that poster, or treat them as hostile individuals who are ENDANGERING THE VALUE of my LONG position. The psychological perceptions of a stock are just as important these days as is the bottom lines or future prospects are of a company. As such, I will post positively on TSIG, as long as I perceive the company to be on track for success.
If a post is negative with a "help me", or "let's try and get to the bottom of this negative aspect of TSIG",,, not only am I all ears, but I'm more of a mind to help because I have had my own concerns addressed by the posters of this board to a very satisfactory degree.
Until all the negative aspects are solved through success,,,the higher risk of investing in a debt ladden company with a poor history is what TSIG is all about. So, either you're willing to accept that risk for HUGE RETURNS down the road by buying TSIG and trusting the new management to take care of those concerns, or you need to dump you're stock and mooooooove on!!!!
If a negative boaster comes in posting negatives with both barrels blazing,,,that poster IMO is bashing TSIG, and as such, is attempting to attack the value of my long position.
I want TSIG to succeed, and for the sake of "MY" position:
I WILL FIGHT BACK!!!
Regards,
-Mark |
