Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG)

MYNG 0.0700

+5.7%

Feb 21 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: the Chief who wrote (8741)	7/8/1998 3:02:00 PM
From: Patrick Lauder	Read Replies (1) of 34075

<By all standards, the work he performed (number and locations of samples) is not supportive of the conclusions he advanced> How can you make this statement when you have never seen his 2500 page report. Also I assume the SEC did not find anything wrong with a similar report by Guido last year where similar figures were published but with no proven. Therefore we must assume the only problem is with the proven!!! In my humble opinion, with all the shafts, steep hillsides, deep trenches, history, etc... the amount of samples seems reasonable. Also, why is it a previous geologist was able to put 5 million inot the proven category, are we assuming his report which we have not seen is not correct. I am not sure but I would imagine the Newmont and Barrick Directors had a look at Guido's report. Are you saying their experience could not see what you see? Respectfully, Pat

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next