SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: kash johal who wrote (34101)7/9/1998 2:26:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) of 1571275
 
kash, re:<Q3 ASP and K6 volume>

if AMD builds 5M K6's next quarter... but only sell 3M of them

AMD would not build that many unless at least 2 new Tier 1's were added, and in that case the market could soak them up. For those who didn't hear CC, the goal is 3.2 to 3.7M K6's with an ASP of at least $100. From the various percentages and info given in the CC, here's what the product breakdown was
0.35æ K6 - 1.50M units @ $63
0.25æ K6 - 0.62M units @ $102
0.25æ K62- 0.55M units @ $119 (CPG revenues were 224M before returns of $4M K5)
(Above table based on statement that 0.25&#181; ASP was significantly above $100.)

Clearly the transition to 0.25 occurred too late and noone wanted the K6-233 and K6-200 anymore (imagine what the ASP of a Cyrix PR200 must be!). There is no such product transition issue in Q3. Both AMD and Intel will be coming out with higher speeds, but an ASP of $100 seems achievable, if not in the bag. Intel will not sell a significant number of CPU's (comparable to 3.5M) at $125 or less.

3.5M units @ $100 = $350M, a jump of $130M. If other units hold their own, this is enough to show a small profit in Q3.

Petz
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext