MIDL .... A Real Sleeper Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MIDL .... A Real Sleeper

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Almost Blue who wrote (2157)	7/9/1998 2:43:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (1) of 7039

For example, the fact that there were problems with the patents? No one knew there were problems with the patenets (didn't someone here on SI find that out on the internet? Well I have a faxed copy from a shareholder of patents that McAndrews sent to him but I never got. Bill is the one after all this broke that discovered the patent problem after talking to Ewert. Who never returned my calls. Was Gary ever privileged to read all the patent information, deal structure and all the DD at the office of Midland? Nope I did however get the patent numbers which I posted Did he sit in on all the meetings to put the deal together? Nope 1. The plant was being built (ie photos on web site). Yep it is on the drawing table at Maverick Engineering those photos are existing equipment in Kentucky 2. Exxon was actually testing DF144. (ie press release and no dispute by Exxon) Nope Exxon request to test DF-144 to date they have no samples I am aware of. 3. The merger or acquisition was completed. Nope no 8K nor audit filings nor shareholder call nor shareholder meeting 4. The patents were in place. That was what was presented in the DD pcakage and finacials at time of acquistion which on June 1998 if was discovered the patents were not there. 5. Plus all the other obvious BS from Fisher. Yes that is a fact GB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next