Amen to the scorned woman thing (you did say scorned and not scored, right?). I respectfully disagree regarding Midland. Midland was providing a service. Like I have said in my other posts, they had a fiduciary responsibility to, in the best of their ability, to protect the shareholders. I guarantee you Gary, if you and others found this out, they should have. Even if they made a mistake, they still made a mistake. You do not make mistakes with others money. You can make mistakes all you want with your money, and I do it often, but never with others money. If I do, I pay. I am going to stop talking about this, because I am starting to feel like a broken record. Is there an attorney out there that can discuss the fiduciary duty of a board et al making an acquisition and the level of duty they have in the due diligence? And to a lesser degree, the level of responsibility Midland assumed when they allowed their name to be used and not dispute actions of others they employ.
Hoping I am not missing something and making a dumb ass out of myself,
DW |
