I liked your original version better, Leigh, didn't it go something like this:
Howdy-doo Wink, this hyar offen happens, as was suggested in an earlier postin', jest befo'e sumpin of greater significance is about t'occur. Yo' hafta admit thet eff'n yo' were one of th' indivijools who is holdin' them warrants, yo''d pleased t'be han'ed an oppo'tunity of this hyar nature. Th' mos' trimenjus item of significance, thet ah can see, is thet it fo'ces th' warrant holders t'exehansum quickly upon a sestained uppurn, as enny fool kin plainly see. This hyar junerates cash fo' th' compenny in a time frame th' compenny kin bank on, postibly t'be used as it is acquired o' t'be used t'he'p acquire some fo'm of bridge financin' t'complete a deal, ah reckon. In addishun, th' extenshun itse'f puts th' compenny in a fine light, fum a future investo''s perspeckive, on account o' they haf made an effo't t'ensure profitability fo' th' investo'. Then thar is th' potential impack on us, th' "regular" shareholder. Th' negative is th' dilushun facko', th' positive is th' likelihood thet it was done fo' a mo' trimenjus reason, ah reckon. Thet bein' t'junerate th' cash t'complete sumpin else. Keep in mind thet this hyar is jest me makin' some assumpshuns/guesses, this hyar is NOT known fack. Jest mah thunks an' opinions.
Salut, Leigh McBain
P.S. You do have a way with words! |
