SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Graham and Doddsville -- Value Investing In The New Era

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (486)7/9/1998 10:07:00 PM
From: Axel Gunderson  Read Replies (1) of 1722
 
the way you are calculating the implied growth rate is incorrect. At least I do it differently.

I agree that the anticipated growth rate over any "next few years" will vary with inflation and projected GDP. However, the average growth in the earnings since the start of 1970 for the S&P 500 is right around 6.4%, plus or minus 0.1%. You can do a three year, five year, or ten year growth rate for each week over that period, average those figures, and you will get around 6.4% for each. You can simply do it over the entire period and get 6.4%. So I was quite content to be lazy and use your 6.3% - especially since I was playing with how somebody who did not consider the risks might rationalize their choice of asset class.

Going by faulty memory, over the past 70 years the earnings growth rate of the S&P 500 was about 4.5%, and over the past 40? it was 5.2%. So we might, if we were inclined to be rather simpletons about it, extrapolate and guess that over our probable future investing lifetimes, the S&P 500 will increase its earnings at say 7.0% per year.

BTW, I hope that everybody realizes that this is all just low grade mental gymnastics, not a philosophical basis for investing.

Axel
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext