Sig: LOL! "Too much riding on his strong endorsement of VLNC...mud." Yah, I'd have to agree with you on that one. You know, I haven't heard of any other analyst yet being invited to one, or the other, plants. But why should I? I'm not important enough to be let in on THAT one, eh? However, it's logical to assume that if he's got his money where his mouth is, and he's convinced his "followers" to lay down some coin on VLNC, too, then of course he'd be in VLNC's face requesting a look see at that plant. Particularly in light of recent firing's and delay's. Everybody needs a "warm & fuzzy" now and then. And this is particularly true when your name has a certain level of media clout, eh? You ain't nuthing if you don't attempt to maintain a hard won reputation.
This, coupled with his history, makes me separate D.W. from the "huckster" class of writer/analyst/commentator's. But human being that he is, is he right, or wrong? Mud, goat, or continued Street darling? Once again, the proof will be in the coming months.
John~ |
