I think you make a good point there Al.
Ron is allegedly charged with a civil suit tied to hypeing a stock as a long shareholder. Ron's posts from other threads have been copied here which were amusingly in agreement with the yeas positions regarding mm's.
With whom does he have most in common? He is not charged with any
nay positions, only yea positions. Food for thought.
Ellen: I want to state that I am not making any connection between RMIL and GNRO, other than one common element. I also never mentioned anybody by name, (I don't think), and for a reason.
I was trying to point out things in a philosophical sense, and whatever connection that was or had to be made to any person was done because there was simply no other way.
The idea that someone accused of fraud on one stock, may be involved with other stocks, and other people, has an importance, IMO, because unless the SEC looks at all of those people's dealings they won't know, will they?
The connection between other posters, is simply that if there is a can of worms here, then this will all come out by the only way it can come out..investigating. I hope I have cleared my posts up, somewhat, if they weren't clear. I hope this one wasn't mish moshed up so it is unclear. |
