Didn't Pugs always say that the best way for a short to be successful was to short a scam? If the company isn't a scam, the shorts must paint it as one. It just doesn't make sense for anyone to put this much time and effort into bashing RMIL unless they were short. If I didn't like the stock, I might say my say and be done with it. It makes no sense to bash a non-trading stock each and everyday unless they're looking for a terminal short.
>>>>>>>Talk : $5 and Under : "BASHERS" POST THEM HERE!!!!!
| Previous | Next | Respond |
To: Larry Voyles (188 )
From: micky Wednesday, Jul 1 1998 3:03PM ET
If it generally is agreed that 9 times out of 10, BB companies are BS,
while MM's are doing what they do per Dr. Meade, 9 times out of 10 they
will win, some bigtime if a company is halted, so they don't have to
cover. It's just business, same as trading, etc.
Strikes me that while irritating, bashers should be listened to 9 times
out of 10, if the logic holds.
If you know a company's fundamentals and people (DD of your own, not SI
style), bashers simply give you something to think about. <<<<<
Micky seems to have alot in common with some of the posters here. Maybe too much, if you ask me.
Rich_1 |
