"My, how you like to twist those facts to suit your ends. Have you checked out PLSIA, and how much FDA approval helped them? Don't wave FDA approval for a medical device as absolution from fraudulent activity by a company."
Aha, now not ccsi and solv but ccsi and plsia. I am for plsia and msft. Plsia is a fraud so must be msft. Tremendous logic.
What fraudulent activity did ccsi do? I am waiting for an answer based on facts, not on ASSensio's assumptions.
"Maisels and Holzman are not paid by the company?"
Why do you think so many doctors are sitting in company boards? Don't you really know that it is common practice to pay them. This is NORMAL and logical, otherwise no doctor would do a study or be an advisor of a company. In which world do you live? The work of Dr Maisel and Dr Holzman has been validated by the FDA approval. Do you think they would damage and kill their high reputation by participating in a scam that could not be hidden in the end?
"The New Orleans presentation was successful? By what definition? Oh that's right, the company and it's paid touts said it was successful, so it must have been so. It's interesting though that it hasn't gotten that "imminent" deal done though. It's also interesting that the presentation was made by someone paid by the company.
sse above. Speak to doctors who have participated in the convention and you will learn another valuable lesson.
"Let's see, who supplied that info to the medical magazine..Research, right? Hmm, that wouldn't have been the company, would it? It sure looked like company produced pablum to me."
If this article supported your position you would tell me "look, it is the medical magazine. The shorters keep citing the street.com, Barrons, Business Week articles. What about these articles? Who paid for them?
"To date, the longs have been able to present nothing but hollow promises made by the company, though they like to call them "facts". Under closer scrutiny, objective analysis concludes that there is a lot of smoke and mirrors creating nothing but illusion."
Objective analysis? You call your interpretation a objective analysis. This is the best joke I have heard for a long time. LOL
Nice try, Barbie Doll. Please make some efforts, I know you can do better.
Manfred |
