Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (12313)	7/11/1998 4:35:00 PM
From: Ruyi	Read Replies (1) of 13949

Merrills report appears totally at odds with any current reports I have read, including a current Canadian Govt. survey. CEO's are not the best source of info.regarding y2k for obvious reasons.The report is also interesting considering Microsofts current position on Y2K compliance or lack of,on it's products.The report looks like a warm and fuzzy to tell it's nervous clients, why they should stay in equities. The report also seems to skirt around many basic issues in the supply side of the equation. IMO it may prove to be the single most irresponsible, self serving piece ever written on y2k, no matter what side of the y2k issue you are on. I did notice the CEO's were already buck passing however.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next