SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MythMan who wrote (3016)7/12/1998 11:47:00 AM
From: Joseph G.  Read Replies (2) of 86076
 
Re: a question you raised before: if a 40% drop in market cap in 1987
did not do too much harm, why now is different?

Many reasons. Globally, in 87 Japan, Asia and Europe were in good
shape and getting better. In US, I compiled the following numbers:
in current $B
1987 (% of GDP) 1998 (% of GDP)
GDP 4,800 100 8,600 100
Treasury debt 2,350 49 5,550 65
total debt 8,500 177 15,500 180
liquidity (L) 4,350 91 6,800 80
stock cap 3,500 73 12,000 140

A 40% drop in stock market cap was a 29% of GDP in 87, now it would
be 56% of GDP, nearly twice larger blow. Also, feds could inflate
easier in 1987, as Treasury debt was smaller fraction of GDP, and
liqudity base was larger.

JMHO
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext