Ron posted more or less exactly as follows:
---"Bloomberg is a very well respected news publication- but if you would like I'll write them a memo to tell them your concerns."---
Not to worry, I already have. I included the URL to my post and will post their reply if it pleases you.
I will admit that my call for a "retraction" was poorly worded. I should have said "clarification". The short mention was simply a trading highlight, not a full-blown story.
----"I happen to have a few friends over there. Best be careful what you say you could get yourself into trouble."---
Well now, I am not sure the Bloomberg News would appreciate being linked to "friends" whose self-serving interests include frequenting forums like this and advocating purchase of a stock that has "questionable" business practices.
Bloomberg like most other news services mostly follows large & middle cap stocks and pulls their feed from the same places as everybody else. The reasons for that are obvious. For one thing the "micro-crap" stocks are so riddled with thieves and liars that to specialize in such reporting risks having your name dragged through the mud along with the pond scum that run these putrid little hair-ball companies.
Once I was following Quarterdeck Software and corresponded with someone from Bloomberg who *clearly* new nothing about the company. A similar experience with Camelot (shit stock: CAML) and IDID tells me they know even *less* about "micro-caps".
One thing for sure.....the people here are playing with fire when the BICO symbol keeps cruising across CNBC's ticker. It is *inevitable* that another day like Friday will bring attention from the *wrong* people (wrong to those who hold the stock and would like to see it continue trading)and after the precedent setting circumstances surrounding IDID, the regulators will not miss a beat in closing BICO's doors. Of *THAT* you can rest assured!
And to address this little gem:
----"Hubert what Market maker do you work for?"----
What MM do I work *for*????? You are many days late and dollars short on that one Ron. I have been accused by more strident and foolish persons than yourself here on SI many times over. I used to practically *live* on this stupid computer posting in every dark corner of it. I have been in on *many* shit-stock run-ups before they happened. I once suggested to someone that I was psychic, and just *knew* when certain things would happen. The most reasonable explanation is "intuition", and I'm a careful note-taker of similarities in trading patterns....hey, whatever works. But then all of that gets one mark as "egotistic", screw it, I have my agenda like everyone else here. A side agenda happens to be raking through meters of guano and eliciting *rational* discussions once in a while.
----"This is the only justification I can see for you writing a long winded and certainly not close to the truth post."----
Yes, and this is a sad commentary....you're saying you'll speak whatever you *think* will raise or lower a stock price, however infinitesmial the outcome may be. I give a rat's patootey if a stock I am holding gets slammed, hyped, or anything else....I do it to *MY OWN* holdings on a regular basis. I have a reasonable expectation that it makes no difference *what* I say, when, or how often.
I can tell you the "huge" quantity of stock traded on this is not an indication of percentages held by "the little guy". I have a rule of thumb to judge this by the number of outraged posts I get in response to messages like the one I posted here.
Ron, clue this.....*NOBODY CARES!*
"I bet you or the market maker you work for are getting killed by the recent run up. I know the truth hurts."
Blah, blah, blah. The enormity of that statements speaks to the *real* magnitude of your influence in the "grander scheme" of things.
Hey Ron, Bite Me....and if it feels good, do it twice!
Cheers! |
