Since you answered my question, I will now answer yours.
I do not believe I have ever "cheerled" for this stock, I have however supported the idea that IF and I REPEAT IF there was a short squeeze, then they could have made a lot of money.
Now, if you want to bring up some posts that I made in the past that I may have forgotten to qualify my statement, be my guest.
I believe that for every one that I may have made the mistake on, there are 300 that I didn't.
I think that even Riley and Pugs, who you all have such a thing for, will attest to the fact that my posts have been very very carefully worded to signify that I was hedging my bets as far as whether or not I believed that this was really going to happen. (and probably to their annoyance)
BTW I also have that endorsement from none other.
I have read many posts concerning a "short squeeze", and what happens in a short squeeze, from your "side", and to be quite frank, I considered them generally, to be out and out lies.
Now, lastly.
We have one result in, and it is a resounding no, on the forwarding of their messages to the SEC.
as per my post <#reply-5171245>
Remember, my request was limited in scope, I didn't ask for every message made on SI, only certain ones.
I wonder what the other responses will be.
Hopefully, someone else could keep the tally.
Where's Dan when you need him?
|
