"Hey Emile, you going to buy the book? Surely you would want to know if some of
your beliefs are based on made up stories. Does anybody else out there care that
they have been duped?"
Why should I buy a book from the Jesus Seminar? Their information is only a
rehash of the material contained in Jewish The Toledot Jeshua(The
hisory of Jesus contained in the antichristian Babylonian Talmud.)
For those unfamiliar with the Babylonian Talmud history of Jesus, let
me give you a brief summary. The Jews who rejected Jesus and formed the
new religion of Modern Judaism recorded their views about Jesus in the Babylonian
Talmud. This account is highly distored and prejudiced against
Jesus, but is, neverthless, the classic history of Jesus used in rabbinical
formation.
The spirit of the Jesus Seminar is taken from the Toledot Jeshua
and is based on hearsay evidence and distorted testimony collected many
centuries after the historical events connected to Jesus's life.
The principles of modern scholarship and judicial proceedings depend heavily
upon first hand or eyewitness accounts to substantiate the veracity of
an event.
The Life of Jesus--his miracles, his Words, his Crucifixion, and his
Resurrection---was observed and experienced by thousands of eyewitnesses.
The Gospel accounts of Jesus's life and Resurrection were eyewitness
accounts. Many of these witnesses prefered to die horrible deaths rather
than deny their testimony.
The Gospel accounts are eyewitness accounts while The Jesus Seminar
and the Babylonian Talmud are mosttly hearsay and prejudiced accounts
collected many centuries after the events. The entire foundation of
modern antichrist Judaism depends on these false hearsay accounts
for its very existence.
Del, you have simply chosen one religiou view over another. You
have simply chosen modern Judaism false and antichrist view over Christianity
historically sound and spiritually accurate view. That is
ok and it is your choice. I dont think you fully realize just
how religious your view really are.
You and others, Del, have chosen these hearsay accounts of prejudiced
and hearsay witnesses recorded centuries after the events rather than the
eyewitness accounts of
contemporary Jewish Christian observers who had actually seen and
heard the things of which they testified. These Christian Jewish
witnesses had, in a worldly sense, everything to loose and nothing to
gain by holding to their eyewitness accounts. Most of the early Jewish
Christian eyewitnesses prefered to be killed rather than recant their
testimony.
These eyewitness accounts have been preserved in Gospels and other
writings contained in the New Testament.
It is not a very rational decision to choose
hearsay evidence over eyewitness evidence. |
