SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Yousef who wrote (34334)7/12/1998 6:22:00 PM
From: Dave Parr  Read Replies (2) of 1572331
 
Yousef, RE: "My statements about AMD being 2-3 years behind Intel are based on performance. AMD's .25um process gate length and gate oxide thickness more closely match
Intel's .35um process."

Thank You for taking the time to explain in such detail. I now have a better sense of what you've been saying all along.

I'm attempting to simplify your explanation; you're saying AMD has all the tools but they don't know how to use them as well as INTEL does. If this understanding is right, it would only take a few key people to help AMD to make great strides.

Do you know how IBM's Process Technology compares with Intel's? If it is comparable, is it possible AMD could "learn" from IBM since they will be manufacturing processors for AMD?

Thanks again......Dave
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News