Wade, my remedial lesson is over! This all started when I felt a poster suggested that TAVA, after the completion of I&A, might receive significantly larger "remediation" contracts ... just like KEA and other Y2K companies. Of course, this is not true. I tried to correct this misperception with the following simple post:
exchange2000.com
NOTE: I substituted the word "fix" instead of "remediate" to try to make this clearer.
If KEA, after I&A, suggested that their customers switch to Oracle or SAP instead of fixing their COBOL code, I doubt KEA's shareholders would call that "remediation"<G>! But certain TAVA posters want to say TAVA performs remediation by recommending replacement, IMO very confusing for non-technical people that follow Y2K.
After my simple and accurate post, the rancorous posts proliferated rapidly. In fact, C.K. Houston alone posted personal attacks on at least three different threads! Actually, IMO I pretty much kept my cool, except with Mr. Zahran, and for that I apologize to the thread.
Hopefully the end result is everyone has a clearer picture of the capabilities of TAVA.
Regards, Bill
|
