SI & Janice acting collusively? Never.
had Mr. Ken M been malicious toward Ms. Shell it seems reasonable that he would
have posted Ms. Shells information when he first received it, and not several days later.
K-K-K-Ken M. is a cop.. They know enough to never act on info they receive without further substantiation. If not, they lose their job or are demoted in rank. His intent was obvious; and clearly set forth in his maliciously repeated posts designed to invade Janice's privacy.
He 'thought it was a business'.....any cop giving that as either reason or excuse would not long be working. And being that he is a cop is more familiar with the ramifications of acting so carelessly.
The reasonable conclusion is that his familiarity with police reports led him to state that he had done nothing about the address in order not to be found guilty of exactly what has occurred: that he recklessly exposed Janice with deliberation.
After K-K-K-Ken M.. was called a creep I am sure that there were many of us once again wondering at Janice's ability for self-control in the face of deliberate and repeated taunts whose excessive personal attacks and vileness only demonstrate the inability of the posters to either read, inform themselves, or show anything but cowardice..
And that goes for those who did not speak out against what occurred as well.
I am Janice's friend, and supporter. I do not have any special status here. When confronted by personal attacks on Janice, or anyone else of whom I am aware, resulting from posting an opinion that some other poster does not like, I will defend her. If the person is toasted due to their own abusive and emotionally violent posts, then I am glad. It means their moronic harassment has found a stop for however brief a time.
I believe the silencing of
members that opposed Ms. Shell, by terminating them, shows a dangerous precedent, and something
that my money will not be a part of. To the members terminated, you have my sympathies for what
happened, and be advised their are other threads that do not act like Nazi Germany, in the way it treats
its members.
This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. You must be aware that, as Janice has said, their abusiveness has gone on for weeks, perhaps longer; and that it just came to full fruition that day and night.
I see SI, as an immature, poorly run
organization, that appears to be more interested in taking revenge out for their friends, than looking
out for legitimate investors.
SI is anything but immature, or poorly run. No revenge was taken - the excessiveness of the posters who were either terminated or banned was responded to in a fair manner.
Your statements argue to the point of inciting certain SI members to take action against SI, and suggest that the actions taken against Janice, and myself, that evening were just fine and dandy.
This would show a favorable bias towards anyone not associated with Janice. You seem to indicate a projection of sympathies for certain tactics, as well as a preference to establish them by your allegation to Nazi Germany, despite how you oppositely utilize the metaphor in your statement. Meaning that you make it sound as though any tactics are ok - because you fail to recognize the utter complacent tripe served up endlessly by those posters who were banned in whatever fashion. But just as ignorance of the law is no excuse, neither are moral fallacies anywhere acceptable.
In this, your arguments are specious, without foundation or substance, and thus collusively tied to those who made those hateful postings. |
